Attorney at Law
821 Witzel Avenue
Oshkosh, WI 54902
(920) 233-3300

I listen, I care,
and I can help you
Useful Website Links
Legislature
Courts
http://wcca.wicourts.gov/index.xsl​
CCAP

http://www.wicourts.gov/casesearch.htm
Wisconsin Court System - Case search

http://www.wicourts.gov/
Wisconsin Court System

http://www.legis.state.wi.us/
Legislative Affairs


http://www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/stats.html
Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations

http://www.legis.state.wi.us/billtext.html
Text and Histories of Legislative Proposals

Agencies and Departments
http://www.dor.state.wi.us/
Department of Revenue

http://www.dot.state.wi.us/
Department of Transportation

http://dcf.wisconsin.gov/bcs
Wisconsin Bureau of Child Support

http://offender.doc.state.wi.us/public
​Wisconsin Sex Offender Registry Site

http://www.state.mi.us/mdoc/asp/otis2.html
Offender Tracking Information Systems (OTIS)

HOW WOULD YOU DECIDE?
                                                                                The Case of the Cautious Clerk

A clerk at a drug store called in a tip to the local police force stating that an intoxicated man had come in to make some purchases and that the allegedly drunk customer was presumed to be going to drive away in a truck that was out in the parking lot.  An officer came to the scene, put the truck under observation and eventually saw a person with an unsteady gait get into the vehicle, start it up and drive away.  Just before the driver began to navigate into a public street, the officer pulled him over and subsequently Driver was charged with two operating while intoxicated felony counts.  He moved to suppress all evidence with respect to his arrest arguing that there was no showing that the drug store clerk was a reliable informant; that the clerk’s knowledge was weak in that the tipster did not see Driver operate his truck or violate the law; and that there was no information on why the clerk thought Driver was intoxicated in the first place.  The trial Judge denied the motion and eventually Driver was convicted on one felony count and appealed to a higher court the denial of the exclusion of the damning evidence against him.  What do you think?  Is a tip from a random person who never personally observed the person actually operating a vehicle while presumed to be drunk enough to lead to an arrest and conviction or is Driver simply trying to slither off of his 5th OWI conviction?​     

                                                                             If you were the Judge: How would you decide?
Effective legal counsel since 1979.
This web site is for general information purposes only and nothing on it should be construed as constituting formal legal advice or the formation of an attorney/client relationship between Attorney Schultz and any viewer.